headerphoto

SEOs Who Party Like Its 1999

Digital Zoom Versus Optical Zoom
The digital camera is but a technological advancement of the conventional analog camera. And thus every component of .....
Search engine optimization has come full circle in the last

couple of years.



Back in the mid 1990s it was easy to achieve high search engine

rankings. Just tweak your META tags and site copy with keywords

and submit. Then, as more and more webmasters started to catch

on to META Tags, it became more difficult to beat the

competition. Many companies turned to spam tactics such as

hidden text (the same color as the background of the page),

hidden links (using 1 x 1 pixel gifs to hide them), doorway

pages stuffed with keywords and cloaked content, all designed to

be seen by search engine robots and not humans in an attempt to

trick the search engines into giving the site a higher ranking.



Thankfully, over the past few years, achieving high search

rankings has become fairer and more straight-forward. The search

engines have given less weighting to META tags and more

relevancy weighting to sites that are popular, of high quality

and contain unique, relevant information. Most search engines

Getting The Right Digital Camera For You
There are really great advantages in digital photography:

You can shoot till you .....
have developed comprehensive spam filters that weed out the

spammers from the legitimate sites and penalize sites caught

trying to cheat the system. Google in particular has led the

charge for quality over quantity.



Fortunately, the web site aspects that most search engines

prefer are also those that visitors prefer. Build a quality site

with plenty of text, up-to-date, relevant content that other

sites link to, a solid navigation system, submit it by hand to

popular directories and search engines and you will be on your

way to high rankings in no time. It's not difficult, it's not

tricky and it certainly doesn't involve any black magic.



That's why I find it difficult to understand search engine

optimizers who party like it's 1999 - using invisible text and

hidden links in some pathetic, misguided attempt to trick the

search engines into believing their site content is the most

relevant. I mean, what are they thinking? I've heard excuses

like "the search engine guidelines are unclear so we have no

Beat Google's Dampening Link Filter With SEO Articles

Most Search Engine Optimization (SEO) experts agree that links back to your site have a great impact on your ranking in the major search .....

choice but to push the envelope". Give me a break. The search

engine guidelines are quite obvious to those who are actually

good at SEO and understand what is necessary to achieve results

for their clients. Many search engines even publish their

guidelines clear as day on their sites. Unfortunately, it seems

this industry is full of lazy non-performers who prefer to rely

on outdated cheat sheets that haven't worked for years.



I am so sick of all the cowboy SEO firms who clog up the search

engine indices with meaningless keyword-stuffed pages, in a vain

attempt to dominate the search rankings with their client's

sites. Don't they do any research? Don't they read the search

engine guidelines? Don't they understand these tactics are

fruitless and ineffective? Don't they know these techniques

haven't worked for years and are regarded as spamming? Don't

they realize they are putting their client's sites at risk of

ranking penalties or outright banning? Don't they care about the

Don't Put All Your Promotion Eggs In The SEO Basket
One of the most frequent questions I get asked by my clients is "What is the best .....
long term effects and the future of their client's web sites?



To see an example of these blatant spamming techniques, visit

Google.com and type in a search for "new zealand power

companies". Visit the first site in the results (a doorway

page), right click the page with your mouse and choose "select

all". Run your mouse over the darkened area at the bottom left

of the page. See all the hidden links? All leading to yet more

doorway pages.



This second example is trickier to find because it appears that

Google has already penalized it. Go to Google.com and type in a

search for "shopping new zealand must involve a visit". Check

out the second page in the results (another doorway) and have a

close look at the little arrows in near invisible font at the

bottom of the page next to "more". Each one of those arrows

leads to another doorway page stuffed with more keywords. I've

even seen examples of companies hiding thousands of keywords in

CSS tags or tables that are coded to an extreme left or right

position so they don't actually appear on the visible page.



What is the point of these tactics? Even if they go unreported,

Google will eventually locate the spam and degrade or ban the

pages. It makes no sense to me why SEO firms would take such

risks with their client's sites when it is so much easier to get

good results using the methods recommended by the search engines.



But as bad as spammy SEO firms are, there are worse offenders.

These are the spammy SEO firms who like to propagate myth and

legend by publishing articles that are misleading, deceptive and

often downright false. No wonder webmasters are confused when it

comes to search engines and no wonder there are more cowboy SEO

spammers springing up every day. With the amount of incorrect

information floating around out there, it is extremely difficult

for newcomers to sort out fact from fiction.



The sad thing is that many of these spam propagators justify

their rubbish with endorsements from big name marketers or

influential web marketing firms who allow them to speak at

conferences and seminars and spread their misinformation. Some

of these spam propagators have even set up their own training

schools to educate people in deceptive SEO tactics.



It really rankles me when I see faulty advice such as the

following being circulated to unsuspecting webmasters:



"...you could place content inside of the tag, even

though the site isn't in frames...it's also not something that's

likely to get you in trouble with Google as long as the content

is relevant to your page."



Creating content designed to be hidden from viewers and shown

Do Higher Digital Camera Prices Mean Better Cameras?
Understanding digital camera prices makes finding the best camera value much .....
only to search engines by misleading use of a tag meant for a

frames-based page? I am almost certain Google would have a

problem with that. What type of example are these people trying

to set? To think they are actually teaching these tactics to

future webmasters is beyond comprehension.



So what can you do to fight back the spam propagators? For

starters:



1) Study the search engine guidelines such as those outlined at:



http://www.google.com/webmasters/guidelines.html



http://insite.lycos.com/searchservices utorial.asp



http://ask.ineedhits.com/programterms.asp?n=u#spam



2) Circulate articles like this one to other webmasters



3) Spend time in knowledgeable webmaster forums such as

http://www.ihelpyouservices.com/forums/



4) Make sure you report any cases of search engine spamming to

Google (http://www.google.com/contact/spamreport.html) and the

other search engines as soon as you spot them.



When we cut spammers off at the source, we can stop the spread

of misinformation and all benefit from the results.



Copyright 2003 by Kalena Jordan. All rights reserved under

U.S. and international law.







About the author:

Article by Kalena Jordan, CEO of Web Rank. Kalena was one of the

first search engine optimization experts in Australasia and is

well known and respected in her field. For more of her articles

on search engine ranking and online marketing, please visit High

Search Engine Ranking.







Sample Tags

Digital Photography Software

Digital Photography

Featured Links

Digital Photography content.